New article: Prehistoric sound, modern classification
What significance did various kinds of sound have for people in the distant past? How can we approach this question today? My article “Classification of Sound, Sound Tools, and Soundscapes” discusses some issues of sound, meaning and classification. It is based on a paper given at XII Nordic Theoretical Archaeology Group meeting in Oulu, Finland, and is now published in Monographs of the Archaeological Society of Finland 2. The article discusses many ways of approaching and classifying sounds, sound tools and soundscapes of the past. For instance, sounds might be regarded as either man-made or non-man-made, and either intentional or non-intentional. “Music” is a problematic concept with an ethnocentric bias, while “intentional sound” is a better concept. The article suggests a tripartite classification of intentional sound, distinguishing between sounds made for functional reasons, for ritual reasons, and, finally, for pleasure and pure expression.
Thoughts on new Norwegian folk music in Finnish journal
In an article published in the Finnish journal Folk och musik I write about new directions…
«Norges lyder» is released and available
What did our forefathers and -mothers hear, in their places, in the countryside and in…
The megaphone from the Kvalsund Ship presented in Barcelona
Earlier this month I participated in the European Association of Archaeologist’s 24th annual meeting, a…
Conference in Austria on Music and Democracy
I spend a few late summer days in Austria, at the conference Participatory Approaches to Music…
Rural bells, Nes in Romerike
Yesterday I participated in a field recording session with the Norwegian Radio in Nes in Romerike…